From Observation to Intervention
What student–AI interaction patterns tell us, and what we can do about them.
Slides (PDF)A learning & teaching research project · Curtin University
Students often use AI like a vending machine: one question in, one answer out, straight into the assignment. Keep Asking tests whether a single, well-timed conversational nudge shifts that pattern toward following up, challenging the answer, and extending the idea.
A randomised controlled trial running across Semester 2, 2026 in four units spanning four disciplines: Business Information Systems, Supply Chain, Marketing, and People, Culture and Organisations. Students complete an authentic AI-assisted task in their usual lab; half see an occasional one-line nudge in the chat, half don't. Everything else is identical: the model, the interface, and the task.
We're asking three things:
The trial is pre-registered, and approved by the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 83897). It is funded by a 2026 Curtin Needs-Based Funding Learning & Teaching grant. Links to the registration and papers will be posted here once peer review concludes.
What student–AI interaction patterns tell us, and what we can do about them.
Slides (PDF)A one-line nudge toward deeper student–AI conversations.
Coming soonDetails and slides to follow.
Coming soonDetails and slides to follow.
Coming soonFour investigators across four disciplines, so we can see whether the effect travels beyond any one field.
Contact: michael.borck@curtin.edu.au
The open-source chat platform that delivers the study: randomised assignment, nudge injection, and a model instructed to answer plainly, so the only structured cue in the trial is ours.
GitHub ↗A task designer for building the authentic, discipline-specific AI-assisted tasks the study runs on: the kind a generic AI answer would get wrong.
taskforge.borck.education ↗